The explosive growth of perpetual decentralized exchanges (perp DEXs) like LogX, Drift, Hyperliquid, and Aevo highlights their innovation and growing popularity in crypto trading. However, a market characterized by volatility and surging interest poses challenges—especially during bull market spikes and liquidity crunches. Below, we break down the critical mechanisms that perp DEXs use to mitigate risks and explore the potential vulnerabilities for liquidity providers (LPs) and traders holding profitable long positions.
Understanding Portfolio-Based Margining
Portfolio-based margining is a system used by several perp DEXs to manage traders’ positions. Unlike isolated margining, where each position has its own margin requirement, portfolio-based systems evaluate the risk across all of a trader’s positions collectively.
How It Works:
If you hold a profitable long position on one asset but a losing short on another, the system may offset the two, considering the net risk of your entire portfolio rather than liquidating one position immediately.
This can be advantageous as it reduces premature liquidations during moderate volatility, allowing traders to manage risks dynamically.
The Risks:
Full Portfolio Liquidation: In extreme scenarios, if the combined value of your portfolio drops below the maintenance margin, the platform could begin liquidating all positions, even profitable ones, to cover the shortfall.
Increased Complexity: For traders, managing risk becomes more intricate as they need to monitor the interplay between different positions rather than focusing on each trade individually.
What Happens During a Liquidity Crunch?
Liquidity crunches occur when the available liquidity in the market dries up, usually during high volatility or when liquidity providers (LPs) withdraw capital en masse.
Impact on Traders:
Slippage: Closing a profitable long position in a liquidity-starved environment can result in high slippage, reducing returns or even turning profits into losses.
Execution Risk: If liquidity is insufficient, a trader’s order might not be filled entirely, leaving them exposed to further market risks.
Impact on LPs:
Volatility Risks: LPs face the possibility of bearing losses if their positions cannot be properly hedged during extreme market moves.
Incentive Drain: During high volatility, LPs may exit en masse unless incentivized with significantly higher returns, leaving the DEX vulnerable.
Strategies for Risk Mitigation in Perp DEXs
LogX and Drift:
Dynamic Margining: Drift utilizes portfolio-based margining and advanced liquidation engines, focusing on partial liquidations to minimize cascading effects. These measures protect LPs and reduce risks to traders during volatile periods.
Risk Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of user positions ensures the platform acts swiftly to mitigate risks.
Hyperliquid:
Insurance Fund: Hyperliquid allocates a percentage of trading fees to an insurance fund, which acts as a safety net during liquidity crises. This reduces the risk of LP exits and helps traders close positions without undue losses.
Validator-Driven Security: Its proof-of-stake model ensures network resilience and scalable transaction processing even under heavy loads.
Aevo:
Hybrid Order Book Model: Aevo uses off-chain order books for speed and on-chain settlement for transparency. It combines the best of centralized and decentralized systems.
Incremental Liquidation: This prevents the system from over-liquidating user portfolios, which can exacerbate liquidity shortages.
Potential Improvements
Dynamic LP Incentives: Platforms need to ensure LPs are compensated adequately during high-risk periods to prevent liquidity drains.
More Robust Insurance Mechanisms: Insurance funds should cover not only extreme events but also provide a buffer for less dramatic market downturns.
Emergency Liquidity Pools: Introducing secondary liquidity pools accessible during crises can stabilize trading activity.
For perp DEXs to thrive in increasingly volatile markets, they must prioritize liquidity stability and user confidence. While innovations like portfolio-based margining, insurance funds, and hybrid settlement models offer a foundation, the risk of liquidity crunches—especially during bull market spikes—remains.
For users, choosing platforms like Hyperliquid or Aevo with robust risk mitigation strategies is vital, especially if holding large or leveraged positions. Meanwhile, DEXs must balance trader incentives with LP protections to sustain their ecosystems during both bull and bear markets.
Oracle Price Risk in Perp DEXs
Oracle systems are critical for perpetual DEXs as they provide accurate price feeds to determine funding rates, margin requirements, and liquidation thresholds. However, they introduce a unique set of risks that can destabilize the platform and lead to cascading effects during high market volatility or manipulation attempts.
What is Oracle Price Risk?
Oracle price risk arises when the data used by a DEX to determine the value of assets is delayed, manipulated, or outright incorrect. Since perp DEXs rely on these feeds to trigger critical actions like liquidations and margin updates, inaccurate or lagging data can lead to severe consequences:
Delayed Liquidations: If an oracle fails to reflect the true market price during rapid price movements, the platform might delay liquidating under-margined positions, exposing LPs to additional losses.
False Liquidations: Manipulated or incorrect prices can trigger unwarranted liquidations, wiping out user positions unfairly.
Excessive Funding Costs: Erroneous price feeds can skew funding rates, leading to unfair costs for traders maintaining long or short positions.
Key Risks and Examples
Price Manipulation:
On-chain oracles can be exploited if attackers manipulate low-liquidity pools to feed false prices into the system.
Example: Flash loan attacks have historically been used to manipulate oracle prices, causing massive losses for DeFi platforms.
Latency and Update Frequency:
High-frequency trading environments require near-instantaneous price updates. Any lag can cause discrepancies between the DEX price and the broader market price, creating arbitrage opportunities or liquidity mismatches.
Off-Chain Dependency:
Platforms using centralized oracles risk becoming vulnerable to outages or single points of failure.
How Perp DEXs Mitigate Oracle Risks
LogX and Drift:
Advanced Oracle Mechanisms: These platforms typically rely on hybrid oracles, combining on-chain data aggregation with off-chain price feeds to improve accuracy and reduce latency.
Price Impact Protection: Drift employs mechanisms that prevent the oracle price from deviating excessively from the spot market price during sudden swings.
Hyperliquid:
Custom Oracle Integrations: Hyperliquid uses a combination of centralized and decentralized oracle solutions, ensuring faster and more reliable price updates. The protocol also monitors for significant deviations, mitigating risks from sudden spikes or drops.
Aevo:
Proprietary Oracles: Aevo leverages its own oracle system, designed to integrate directly with its hybrid model. By controlling the price feed pipeline, it ensures consistency and minimizes the risks of external manipulation.
Best Practices for Traders and LPs
Diversify Trading Platforms: Spreading positions across multiple DEXs reduces the impact of oracle-specific risks on a single platform.
Monitor Oracle Integrity: Traders should keep an eye on oracle updates and any discrepancies in reported prices versus spot markets.
Conservative Margining: Maintain larger buffers in volatile markets to account for potential delays or inaccuracies in price feeds.
Oracle price risk is a critical, often underestimated vulnerability in perp DEXs. While platforms employ innovative measures to address these risks, the reliance on oracles will always introduce a layer of unpredictability. Mitigating this requires a combination of robust technical solutions, user vigilance, and platform transparency to ensure fair and secure trading environments.
Ready to start your trading on-chain?
Explore the cutting edge of decentralized perpetual trading with these top platforms:
Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange (DEX), is redefining perpetual trading with its innovative approach to speed, transparency, and trading efficiency. Built on its proprietary HyperBFT blockchain, the platform combines the best of centralized exchange (CEX) performance with decentralized finance (DeFi) principles. This article explores its strengths, potential challenges, and how it compares to competitors like Orderly Network and LogX.
Key Strengths of Hyperliquid
1. Ultra-Low Latency and High Throughput
Hyperliquid’s standout feature is its HyperBFT consensus mechanism, enabling near-instant trade execution with a latency of just 0.2 seconds. Capable of processing up to 100,000 transactions per second, the platform delivers an unprecedented trading experience for high-frequency traders and institutional players.
2. Fully On-Chain Order Book
Unlike many DEXes that rely on off-chain components, Hyperliquid’s order book and matching engine are entirely on-chain. This approach ensures transparency, allowing users to independently verify trades while maintaining decentralization.
3. Advanced Trading Tools
Hyperliquid offers sophisticated tools that rival those of top CEXes. These include:
Leverage up to 50x.
Advanced order types such as Take Profit/Stop Loss.
Integration with TradingView for seamless charting and analysis.
4. Cost Efficiency
The platform eliminates gas fees for trades, charging only minimal fees for deposits and withdrawals. This structure is particularly attractive to high-frequency traders who value low-cost operations.
5. Community-Driven Liquidity
The Hyperliquidity Provider (HLP) program allows users to contribute liquidity and earn rewards. Additionally, the referral program incentivizes community growth, fostering a robust user base.
Challenges Facing Hyperliquid
1. Competing with Established Players
Hyperliquid faces stiff competition from market leaders like Binance and dYdX, as well as emerging platforms like Orderly Network and LogX. Convincing traders to migrate remains a key challenge.
2. Perceived Centralization
Despite its decentralized ethos, Hyperliquid’s proprietary Layer 1 raises concerns about centralization. Future plans to decentralize its infrastructure aim to address this issue but will require time to implement.
3. Retail User Accessibility
While professionals benefit from its advanced tools, new traders may find the platform’s features intimidating. Simplifying the user interface could broaden its appeal.
4. Liquidity Challenges
As a new platform, Hyperliquid must scale its liquidity to match competitors. Its innovative programs aim to attract market makers, but this remains a work in progress.
Ready to Experience Hyperliquid?
Discover the next level of decentralized trading with Hyperliquid. Discover Hyperliquid!
Challenges of Hyperliquid
1. Competition from Established Players
While its features are robust, Hyperliquid competes with giants like Binance and Uniswap. Convincing users to migrate or adopt it as a primary platform remains an uphill battle, despite its speed and transparency.
2. Centralization Concerns
Despite its decentralized framework, Hyperliquid’s proprietary Layer 1 architecture raises questions about the level of centralization. Until its planned decentralization initiatives are fully realized, this may deter purist DeFi users.
3. Learning Curve for New Users
For retail traders accustomed to simpler interfaces, Hyperliquid’s advanced tools and order types may seem complicated. While these features attract professionals, they might deter casual users.
4. Scaling Liquidity
To compete effectively, Hyperliquid must ensure deep liquidity across trading pairs. As a new platform, it must actively attract market makers and trading volume to sustain its order book model.
Comparison with other leading Perps platforms
Here’s a comparison with other leading platforms like dydx, logx and aevo
Key Metric
Hyperliquid
dYdX
LogX
Aevo
Execution Speed
0.2s latency, 100,000 TPS via HyperBFT
~1s latency (StarkEx L2), moving to Cosmos
100ms latency on Layer-2
Low latency via Layer-2 (EVM-compatible)
Liquidity Source
Decentralized liquidity pools
Robust DEX liquidity pools
Aggregated from CEXs like Binance and Coinbase
Decentralized liquidity pools
Trading Volume
Over $1B daily volume
$331M+ daily volume
Volume spread across integrated networks
Specialized in derivatives; lower overall volume
Transaction Costs
Gasless trading for orders, minimal withdrawal fees
Gas costs on StarkEx Layer-2
Gasless trading via $LOGX subsidies
Low costs on Layer-2
Product Specialization
Perpetual swaps, professional-grade tools
Perpetual swaps, margin trading
Cross-chain interoperability, infinite liquidity
Perpetuals and options
Strength
Ultra-low latency, fully on-chain order book
Proven track record, massive community
Deep liquidity from CEX aggregation
Derivatives-focused innovation
Challenge
Centralization concerns, liquidity scaling
Migration risks, UI complexity
Dependence on CEX liquidity
Niche product appeal, competitive space
Ready to Experience High-Speed Trading on Hyperliquid?
Join Hyperliquid today and enjoy the perfect blend of speed, transparency, and advanced trading tools. Start trading now!
In this article, we will go over the concepts of liquidity layer and explore what differentiates Elixir.
Price discovery in liquidity pools
Decentralized exchanges use an automated market maker (AMM) model to facilitate trades. Instead of relying on order books, users trade against liquidity pools that contain reserves of various tokens. These pools are automated by smart contracts, adjusting token prices based on supply and demand.
For pools with low liquidity, this can be problematic since a large trade can affect the supply and demand metric of that specific pool, while the price of that token remains stable on the overall market. This phenomenon is known as “slippage”. Slippage occurs when a trade is executed for a larger size than the liquidity available in the pool. In such cases, the price of the token can deviate from the market price as the trade absorbs the available liquidity in the pool. So a token price can vary from a pool to another and it creates arbitrage opportunities. Traders monitor different pool and can buy low on a platform and sell high on another, which will stabilize the price across the platforms.
Prevention mechanisms
Decentralized exchanges such as Uniswap implement a constant product market maker mechanism. This ensures that the tokens pair quantities in a liquidity pool stays consistent. Consequently, when the price of one token rises from increased demand, its pool quantity decreases while the other token’s quantity rises. This regulates the price automatically. Other mechanisms include offering incentives for providing liquidity, multiple pools for the same pairs and advanced trading features like limit orders.
While these methods assist in reducing the impact of slippage to a certain degree, decentralized exchanges still face some challenges in offering liquidity and price stability compared to centralized exchanges. Traders and liquidity providers must assess these aspects before engaging in trading and providing liquidity on DEXes.
Aggregation Platforms
Various platforms like 1inch consolidate liquidity from multiple DEXes and liquidity pools, enabling traders to tap into increased liquidity and potentially reduce slippage by dividing orders among various providers.
While these platforms helps users automatically find the best prices the basic problem remains low liquidity.
Elixir liquidity layer
Elixir is a DeFi protocol that specializes in offering an infrastructure for liquidity provision and management. What differentiates Elixir from other liquidity layers such as Uniswap is its dynamic liquidity provision model. Elixir focuses on efficiency and optimization. The protocol dynamically adjusts rewards based on market conditions and liquidity needs, incentivizing liquidity provision where it’s most needed. By dynamically adjusting rewards and liquidity allocations, the protocol aims to maximize liquidity utilization and improve overall market efficiency. Elixir is natively integrated with many leading decentralized exchanges and orderbook exchanges.
Currently, Elixir have an airdrop program where you earn potions for providing liquidity. You can provide liquidity on ethereum mainnet or on arbitrum/SUI by using their native integration with dexes.
Here’s the documentation, make sure to understand all the risks included in supplying liquidity as many layers of smart contracts are involved.
The first generation of defi applications allows users to swap various tokens without the need for traditional intermediaries like exchanges. It enables users to trade tokens directly from their cryptocurrency wallets through smart contracts. Users can become liquidity providers by depositing pairs of tokens into liquidity pools. In return, they earn fees from trades.
This is an efficient way for users to earn a yield on assets they already own, however there’s the risk of impermanent loss. If a token price drops significantly , the liquidity provider ends up holding the asset with the least value. Most of the defi protocols now lets the users specify the price ranges they are comfortable with. If these prices are exceeded, the user exits the pool automatically. While this helps protect from impermanent loss, it takes more management and monitoring. When a users exits the pool automatically, he stops earning yields. The users have a choice to enter managed pools where a 3rd party would rebalance and manage the pool for a small fee.
Pool managing tools
New tools like Aperture helps users to manage pools from different providers. It offers an “intent” infrastructure where users declare their goals and the platform executes them. It offers automatic rebalancing strategies, automatic fee compounding and much more. There is an airdrop campaign ongoing where you can earn points while interacting with the protocol. We recommend doing an extensive research before using the platform. You need to understand the smart contract risks associated and understand how the “position permit” signatures work. Here’s an example of a rebalancing.
Demex is a new generation decentralized exchange designed for trading complex financial instruments and derivatives across several blockchains. Anyone can be a market maker by contributing liquidity and making money from trading fees. It offers a wide range of features including trading derivatives, lending or borrowing tokens, minting stablecoins and providing liquidity.
The fact that it is a decentralized exchange means there is not 3rd party involved and no custodial. Everything is managed by smart contracts and code.
Risks
While trading cryptocurrencies comes already with a lot of risk because of volatility, trading on a dex adds a smart contract malfunction of hack risk. If something happens no one is liable. So it’s very important to understand the risks and do your own research before using such technologies.
For example, when you supply your favorite coin to a lending pool, users have to deposit a collateral to be able to borrow it. Usually users have to provide more collateral than what they borrow, but they could do so with many different coins. Now let’s say one of the coins on the collateral side looses all its value (let’s say LUNA for example). For sure the lender prefers to get liquidated rather than paying back the loan and returning your favorite coin. So you are left with worthless coins.
As decentralized exchanges get more sophisticated they try to put some guards in place, however it’s still too early for these safety measures to be bulletproof.
That being said, let’s review how you can lend your assets using Nitron on Demex:
We will be using keplr wallet, which is a great wallet mostly for the COSMOS ecosystem.
The first step is to connect to demex and create your account. Once this is completed, you can click on “Nitron” and search for the coin you wish to lend:
Once you find your coin, click on “lend”. In this example we clicked on stTIA. If you don’t have stTIA on Demex, you will have to deposit some from your wallet. Click on “Deposit”
Transfering your tokens
On the next screen, you have to choose the network that has your coins and the balance you wish to transfer to Demex:
Once you choose the amount to transfer and click on Deposit, you will have to accept the transaction in your wallet. This will trigger and IBC transaction and you will have to pay for the transaction fee with the coin of your chain. In our example, the fees have to be paid using STRIDE coin. The IBC transaction will move the coins from their chain of origin (Stride) to the Demex chain (Carbon).
It is important to note that once your coins are transferred, you might not see them anymore in your wallet, unless your wallet supports displaying your assets that are on Demex/Carbon.
Complete the transaction
Once completed you go back to the previous step and you can see your coins available to lend:
You can choose how much to lend and whether you want all the amount to be available as collateral or not. This means the amount you wish to make available as collateral for future borrowing.
You will have to confirm the transactions in your wallet. Note that the transaction fee is paid in SWTH, which is the coin used for the Carbon chain.
Once completed, you can start borrowing against the collateral portion:
You can always increase or decrease the amount of the collateral later on:
Borrowing
To borrow some funds, find the coin you wish to borrow and click on borrow:
In this example, we are borrowing milkTia:
We can borrow up to 6.59 in this example, however that puts us at risk of liquidation. Always check your Health Factor and make sure it’s in a good position. You have to verify it daily and verify the interest rate as it can vary too. A spike in the interest rate can get you liquidated.
In this example, since the provided collateral and borrowed asset are all liquid TIA, we know that there won’t be a lot of price fluctuation. However if your supplied assets value go down while the borrowed asset goes up, you will need to rebalance.
Again, it’s not financial advice, you should do your extensive research before deciding to use these features.
Here’s the result of the borrowing transaction:
The Nitron dashboard is nicely done, we can see all the information easily:
We have our total asset, health factor, net APY and the “return” button very accessible.
The question now is why would we borrow milkTIA or stTIA if we already have some? This strategy applied at scale will increase our holdings and could help us farm the borrowed coin’s airdrop. It depends whether they consider the net balance or total balance for the airdrop. There are no guarantees.
We can also use the borrowed asset to lend it back, which will improve our health:
Don’t forget that by using Demex, you could be eligible for its future airdrop.
MerchantMoe is developed by the same team as TraderJoe, the popular dex on Avalanche. It has a similar UI and gives us many options between swapping, staking and farming:
It’s very straightforward to SWAP on the platform, here’s an example of swapping USDC to JOE, the utility token of traderJOE:
Don’t rely on the transaction fees that appear in metamask:
The fees were higher once completed. Almost 0.18 to Approve Spend and 0.18 to swap.
Moe also offers you the possibility of farming with many available pools.
There’s also a bridge to transfer your JOE tokens between the different chains (Arbitrum, Mantle, Avalanche and BNB). However it should be expensive to use.
You can check Butter, another leading platform on Mantle.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
